Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by law." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

fourteen. During the light in the position explained higher than, it really is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it suitable into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application from the death penalty or life imprisonment depends within the specifics of each case, which include any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

extensive period petitioner wasn't regarded for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)

The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological features allows for the more detailed legal reaction.

                                                                  

Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

nine.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

When the petitioner is actually present with the place of occurrence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in this kind of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided from the uncovered trial Court after recording on the evidence.

Therefore, it absolutely was held that the right to a healthy environment was part with the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and fourteen with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all this kind of amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to take pleasure in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence and also the separation of powers.

When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble case law on maintenance in pakistan Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to with the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they'd nothing to fret about.